From a Prisoner:

"Stand with the LGBT comrades more firmly inside these walls and out"

May 12, 2013 | Revolution Newspaper | revcom.us

 

I was just reading several articles in the April 7th, 2013 Revolution newspaper and I got the urge to share a few of my thoughts with those in the movement, particularly those in the Black and Latino demographics inside prison and out. Carl Dix said something in one of his articles to which I've been trying to live up to more and more in the past few years. He said:

There's been a lot going on around marriage equality lately. I want to issue a challenge around this, especially to Black people and other oppressed people, people this system beats down. That challenge is to get with the demand for marriage equality for Lesbian, Bi-Sexual and Transgender (LGBT) people, and even more to demand full acceptance of LGBT people and the complete rejection of the bigotry and venom directed against them in this society. This is something that destroys lives, AND it strengthens the overall system which is our common enemy." (p. 11)

From the Prisoners Revolutionary Literature Fund:

Contribute to Get BAsics and Revolution Newspaper to Prisoners

This recent letter from a prisoner is a powerful and principled self-interrogation responding to "A Challenge Around Marriage Equality from Carl Dix" that appeared in Revolution #300, April 7, 2013. This is an inspiring example of the ideas that are being called forth from those behind the prison walls by the revolutionary literature sent by the Prisoners Revolutionary Literature Fund—Revolution newspaper, books like BAsics, from the talks and writings of Bob Avakian, and other revolutionary and progressive literature. But this literature can only continue to get to prisoners through your contributions.

YOU CAN HELP MAKE IT HAPPEN! Donate generously to PRLF. Share this letter with everyone you know and ask them to donate too.

  • $10 will send one copy of BAsics to a prisoner
  • $200 will send copies of BAsics to 20 prisoners
  • $35 will renew a 1-year subscription for a prisoner to Revolution newspaper
  • $350 will renew 10 prisoner subscriptions to Revolution newspaper

HOW TO DONATE:

Non-tax-deductible donations can be made by:

Going online at PRLF.org OR by mailing a check/money order, payable to PRLF, to:

Prisoners Revolutionary Literature Fund
1321 N. Milwaukee Ave. #407, Chicago, IL 60622

www.prlf.org    773.960.6952  contact@PRLF.org

I can't say I've always tried to live up to this challenge. I remember several years back when I went back to the county jail to give back some time, I was placed in a situation to where I feel I totally failed this little brother, who was gay and being "verbally lynched" by a number of brothas in a holding cell we were all in. Now, none of us in that holding cell knew each other, so there weren't any clear groupings or existing factions of any sort which could be readily assessed, except that a number of us were from the joint and being sent back to our separate facilities. Sometimes stuff as superficial as that can be a type of "unifying principle" amongst dudes, establishing a sort of quasi-group within a group. Well... this particular situation that wasn't even present, so we're all nothing more than a group of individuals for the most part, until something happened that immediately divided everything into two, superficially.

The c.o.'s had brought in a slim light-skinned brother who had stuff scrawled all over his Nikes in permanent marker or pen in numerous places that read stuff like "Dick Sucker!" and other homophobic and bigoted phrases. After one of the guys noticed it, he immediately spoke up and provocatively inquired about it in front of everybody. Come to find out while he was asleep somebody in the cellblock he was in had gotten ahold of his shoes and written those phrases all over his tennis shoes.

It seemed like as soon as this became "the breaking news" amongst everybody, it took upon a life of its own. I could tell by the light-skinned brotha's responses that he was more than likely gay or bisexual; and I think everybody else began to infer the same, even though he continually denied he was. At one point the inquiries ended and the group divided superficially into two. You had those who openly began showing their bigotry towards him by verbally attacking him directly and indirectly (homosexuality in general); and then you had those like me, who chose to stay out of it for the most part, even though I personally had already reached that point in my life where I no longer viewed homosexuality as being a "choice." I believed people were born gay. Instead of showing solidarity with him though—no matter if he was gay or not—I actually implicitly did the complete opposite, since the only comment I made throughout that whole ordeal was to ask him an ambiguous question, which could be read into in multiple ways. At one point I interjected by asking him, "Are you gay?" His answer back to me was "NO!" Even though I felt he was lying, the answer he gave me afforded me the justification I was looking for, so I didn't feel so bad inwardly for not standing up for him.

I never quite convinced myself about the validity of my rationalization of that day because I know deep down that my ambiguous question had very little to do about finding out his true sexual orientation, so I could stand in solidarity with him if he was gay; it had more to do with me justifying why I didn't vocalize my convictions on that subject, not only as it related to that brotha in particular, but also when it came to that whole subject PERIOD. I chose to stay on the sidelines because I didn't want to become marginalized by my stand. That was the REAL REASON why I failed to divide everything into two MORE SHARPLY, forcing people to either stand with all that bigotry being tossed around or side with me in support of the LGBT community's FULL EQUALITY and HUMANITY. I'm not sure if I would've been able to convince ones to take the type of stand I was fully capable of asserting that day, but I'm sure my adamant stance would've put all that bigotry on the defensive and forced everyone to at least challenge and question the bigoted positions which were being flung around.

To this day I look back at that situation as the day that I failed that brotha and the whole LGBT movement. Anytime I think back to it, I feel like one of those so-called white liberals, who were supportive of the Black Liberation Movement of the '60s and '70s, but occasionally when they were around some of their bigoted family and friends they were always "lukewarm" or silent whenever they heard a bigoted remark in their presence—and in some cases, even laughed at the racist remarks. We all know about "those types" and how "lukewarm" liberals can be when it comes to their convictions, but how many of us do the same damn thing when it comes to LGBT issues? How many of us have stood in silence or taken half-ass positions or even laughed whenever one of our family members, friends, or acquaintances were clearly on some homophobic, bigoted bullshit? Are we not acting like those liberal whites in the '60s and '70s, who did the same when it came to our struggle back then? How is that not betrayal? How is that being a true communist?

Ever since that situation, though, I've made it a point to divide things SHARPLY into two, anytime that subject has came up—no matter if there's been LGBT guys present or not. There's been plenty of times over the years I could name that my family, friends, or even complete strangers have either made a homophobic or bigoted comment in my presence, and I did what I was supposed to do as a human being and a communist. I stood firmly with the LGBT movement UNAMBIGUOUSLY. By the time most of those discussions ended, many of those individuals (not all though) either stopped using bigoted comments around me, agreed to disagree with me without displaying their bigotry around me again, or even questioned the basis of their own reactionary arguments and positions on the subject.

I remember one situation in particular, where a group of my own dudes were going in on this white dude on our range (tier), who was bisexual and openly so. I ended up jumping out there in support of him, even calling my guys bigots and everything, while arguing valid points of why they were wrong and being unscientific in their approach to the subject. To skip over most of what transpired that particular day, that particular situation created an overall atmosphere on the range, where everyone knew they couldn't just pick on him without me coming to his aid and assistance. That guy, himself, even became more assertive about being gay and proud of it due to my stance with him. A few made joking remarks about our gay/straight alliance, but ah... we were both cool with that. I never could get my guys to reassess their own views on the subject, though, but what I did gain throughout my stay on that range was that guy's respect, while gaining mines back for not standing up for that light-skinned brother years ago.

For me, that was a redeeming moment, but also something I realized I would have to do for the rest of my life, if I want to be true to my communist convictions and stand on these 4 ALLs at all times—in prison and when I get back on the outside. If not, I'll be nothing more than a "lukewarm" liberal on this issue, if I allowed my silence or whatnot to perpetuate what is clearly no different than racism in effect; they both deny or delegitimize one's humanity to one extent or another. It's not about civil rights to me. For me, it's a bigger human rights issue.

One of my favorite questions to ask someone to make this all the more clear to them, is: "If scientists ever discover a genetic basis for us being either heterosexual or LGBT, would you be able to accept the scientific validity of such a finding or would you still hold to the same bigoted views you have now?" Questions like that, which presents a dilemma for them, really digs into the essence of the issue no matter what their worldview is, and places their reactionary positions on the defensive to such an extent, that it forces them to confront their own bigotry. You still have racists who still believe in the biological inferiority of Blacks and other races, but look how ridiculous they look today in the face of all the scientific evidence that contradicts such bullshit. I haven't came across one white supremacist yet, who recognizes the scientific validity of evolution, and who at the same time can justify their white supremacist beliefs. Every last one I've debated one-on-one have conceded the fact that their beliefs were politically and culturally driven, and not driven by any biological facts based in science. Every last one of them have admitted this to me! That's another reason why we ALL need to be well-versed about evolution and its wider significance.

Another argument I hear a lot is that homosexuality (LGBTs) isn't normal. Well... that's not a strong argument as it may initially seem because whenever we use the word "normal" it only has any concrete meaning in a relative sense; in other words, "normal" compared to what? Just because someone may not be able to be classified amongst the majority in some capacity, doesn't mean we can't attach a sense of "normalcy" to them that is concrete. Even though left-handed people and hermaphrodites (people who are born with a penis and a vagina) may not be classified as being amongst the majority of the population, a percentage of people across the globe are born every year left-handed or hermaphrodite, and probably even rarer, left-handed hermaphrodite. Is that normal? Yeah, percentage-wise... ratio-wise, that may only occur once in every 20 births (for someone to be born left-handed) or once in every 200 births (for someone to be born hermaphrodite) or once in every 375 births (for someone to be born left-handed and hermaphrodite), but that is NORMAL and NATURAL. (The above ratios are arbitrary numbers of my own to make a point.) The term "normal" has no concrete meaning, if it's not understood in a relative context. Any other context is idealist, and not materialist.

So yeah... I agree with Carl Dix. We all, particularly Blacks and Latinos, need to start being more vocal in our communities about this, even in prison. While we began to stand with the LGBT comrades more firmly inside these walls and out, we also need to start standing up and being more vocal on these other issues affecting women too, such as abortion. When Sunsara Taylor is out here leading these "Roe v. Wade" demonstrations and connecting all that up to the larger material force behind it—the capitalist-imperialist system—we need to start being more of a presence at these demonstrations too. It shouldn't be all women at these sort of demonstrations. We in the movement should always see all these particular campaigns as part of a larger movement for revolution, which we all need to directly participate in and support—be it the movement against the New Jim Crow of mass incarceration; or the movement to end pornography, patriarchy, the enslavement, and degradation of women; or the "Set the Record Straight" Campaign which Raymond Lotta often spearheads (against the slanders and distortions of communism). What they all have in common is that they all seek to make a radical rupture with traditional property relations and traditional ideas in one form or another, which is integral to us Fighting the Power, and Transforming the People, for Revolution. (BAsics 4:6)

Yeah, they all have their particular contradictions that we're struggling against on one hand; yet on the other hand, they all stem and are conditioned by the same source, the capitalist-imperialist system; and we need to never lose sight of that or be reluctant to go against the tide and being marginalized for it, especially when it comes to standing in solidarity with the LGBT movement. We should always strive to be on the side of history, reality, and truth. Anything less in my opinion is some "lukewarm" liberal bullshit.

In solidarity,

Send us your comments.

If you like this article, subscribe, donate to and sustain Revolution newspaper.